Document Type : پژوهشی
Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophical and Social Foundations of Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Abstract
In recent decades, the reconsideration of children’s moral education through interdisciplinary approaches has emerged as a significant concern in the philosophy of education. This article offers a critical reflection on the possibility of reconstructing moral education by bringing virtue ethics into dialogue with critical sociology, thereby developing a conceptual and practical framework for rethinking the field. The central question guiding the study is how establishing a conceptual connection between virtue ethics and key sociological categories such as inequality, justice, and capital can contribute to a critical understanding of children’s moral education within contemporary educational and social contexts. Methodologically, the article draws on conceptual analysis and adopts a philosophical-interpretive approach, through which ethical and sociological concepts are examined in dialectical dialogue. The analysis suggests that an interdisciplinary interpretation of virtue ethics—one that foregrounds social dynamics, power relations, and structural inequalities highlighted by critical sociology—can move moral education beyond abstract and individualistic orientations toward a more contextualized, concrete, and critical understanding of ethical formation. From this perspective, moral education is understood not merely as an individual process but as a form of ethical formation embedded in social fields and shaped by children’s cultural and social capital. Accordingly, incorporating interdisciplinary perspectives into the study of moral education can contribute to a more critical and potentially transformative approach to educational policy and practice.
Synopsis
This article addresses children's moral education by asking how morality is formed and taught in relation to the social, cultural, historical, and political contexts of children's lives. In many conventional formulations, moral education is reduced to the transmission of rules and values or to the correction of children's behavior. Within such a view, the child appears primarily as a recipient of established norms, while the roles of family, school, peers, social class, cultural resources, and power relations in the development of moral character receive limited attention. This approach can place responsibility for injustice and moral failure disproportionately on the individual. The article therefore critically reconstructs this view and examines the possibility of bringing virtue ethics into dialogue with critical sociology. This connection does not deny the importance of individual virtues or replace character with structure. Rather, it seeks to provide a framework in which the cultivation of moral character, awareness of social conditions, and capacity to question inequality are addressed together. The central question is how moral education can move from an abstract, individual-centered model toward a contextually situated and transformative process that prepares children for responsible participation in collective life and for confronting injustice.
Methodologically, the study is a theoretical, analytical, and conceptual inquiry conducted through a philosophical-interpretive approach. Ethical and sociological concepts are reread and integrated through a dialectical dialogue. The research proceeded in two stages. First, theoretical literature on virtue ethics, sociology of morality, moral education, social justice, inequality, capital, field, and habitus was examined. Classical and contemporary perspectives on character, virtue, human flourishing, and the common good were also analyzed. Second, conceptual analysis and synthesis were used to identify key concepts, clarify their relationships, and derive the educational implications of the proposed framework. Accordingly, the article does not seek to statistically test or provide empirical evidence for the effects of a particular educational program. Instead, it establishes theoretical foundations for designing and evaluating such programs. The analysis rests on the premise that moral education cannot be adequately understood without examining the social environment and institutions that shape children's lives. Any educational design must therefore consider the individual level of character and the structural level of opportunities and inequalities simultaneously.
The first finding indicates that the sociology of morality can be examined through three theoretical traditions. The diagnostic tradition views morality as a mechanism of social integration; the neutral or agnostic tradition understands it as a plural phenomenon dependent on groups and historical contexts; and the critical or gnostic tradition treats morality as an arena intertwined with power, domination, and inequality. The article argues that the critical tradition offers greater potential for rethinking moral education because it makes the moral background visible. Moral background refers to the social and cultural factors, lived experiences, institutional relationships, and structural positions that influence the recognition, selection, and enactment of moral action. From this perspective, children's morality develops neither in a vacuum nor solely within the child's mind, but within a network of social relations and unequal opportunities.
The second finding is that virtue ethics and critical sociology can complement one another when both are critically reread. Virtue ethics emphasizes character formation, moral habits, practical reasoning, and human flourishing; however, when it neglects the social conditions under which virtues can be realized, it risks individualizing morality. Critical sociology shows that cultural and social capital, educational opportunities, the quality of relationships, class position, and experiences of discrimination affect the possibility of cultivating virtues. In the proposed framework, virtue is not a neutral attribute detached from history; it is a practical response to the real problems of social life. Justice is likewise more than fair conduct in interpersonal relations. It is a structural commitment to identifying and transforming the mechanisms that produce educational inequality. The framework uses habitus to explain how patterns of perception and action become internalized, field to understand social arenas, and capital to explain unequal distributions of resources and opportunities. Moral education should therefore cultivate both the capacity for individual self-formation and the ability to criticize and transform unjust conditions.
Conclusion
The third finding concerns the redesign of moral education in schools. In the proposed model, the child is not a passive recipient of official values but an emerging moral and civic agent who should, in age-appropriate ways, understand power relations, differences in opportunity, inequality, and the social consequences of action. This shift moves education from conformity toward participatory and critical practice. Appropriate methods include guided dialogue, analysis of real-life situations, stories and moral dilemmas, group activities, and reflection on everyday experiences in school and society. The teacher acts as a guide and facilitator who connects the cultivation of virtues to an understanding of their social context. The school, in turn, should be organized as a moral community: teacher-student relations, the distribution of opportunities, rules of participation, and mechanisms for resolving conflict should be consistent with justice, respect, dialogue, and collective responsibility. Critical moral education, however, should not lead to relativism or leave children unsupported in the face of social complexity. Teaching about power and inequality requires gradual progression, developmental appropriateness, professional guidance, and an explicit connection to moral virtues. Overall, the article concludes that bringing virtue ethics and critical sociology together can provide a basis for moving from individualistic moral education toward an approach that is contextualized, social, justice-oriented, and emancipatory. The framework's principal innovation is its simultaneous attention to character and structure. Virtue without the improvement of social conditions, and structural critique without the cultivation of moral character, cannot independently produce sustainable educational action. Because the study is theoretical, field testing and examination of the framework's applicability in schools remain essential directions for future research.
Keywords
Subjects
