##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

علی وحدتی دانشمند

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش نقد رویکرد رسمی اصلاحات آموزشی در ایران بوده و در مسیر تحقق، از ایده نقد درونی که نخست از سوی هگل مطرح شده و سپس با تغییراتی از سوی مارکس و فیلسوفان مکتب فرانکفورت بسط و مورد دفاع قرار گرفته است، استفاده شده است. در بخش اول مقاله، اندیشه های هگل، مارکس و آدورنو در باب نقد درونی مورد واکاوی قرار گرفته است. در بخش دوم مقاله، متناظر با هر کدام از این فیلسوفان، سه پیشنهاد بر خلاف جریان رایج اصلاحات رسمی مطرح شده است. در پایان و به عنوان نتیجه گیری، اصول نقادی درونی نظام آموزشی بیان شده و سه نقد مطرح شده از سوی مشاوران ماوراء بحار، محمد علی طوسی و صمد بهرنگی نیز بر این اساس ارزیابی شده اند.

جزئیات مقاله

کلمات کلیدی

نقد درون زا, اصلاحات آموزشی, نظام آموزشی ایران, هگل, مارکس, آدورنو

مراجع
Adorno, T. W. (1973). Negative Dialectics. E. B. Ashton (Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Adorno, T. W. (1982). Against Epistemology: A Metacritique (Studies in Husserl and the Phenomenological Antinomies). W. Domingo (Trans.). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Adorno, T. W. (1983). Prisms. MIT Press.
Adorno, T. W. (1999). Minima Moralia. E. F. N. Jephcott (Trans.). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Adorno, T. W. (2005). Minima Moralia. H. Farazandeh (Trans.). Isfahan: Naghshe Khorshid. (In Persian).
Alamolhoda, J. (2009). Islamic theory of education. Tehran: Imam Sadegh University Press. (In Persian).
Bagheri, K, Sajjadieh, N, Tavassoli, T. (2014). Research approaches and methods in philosophy of education. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. (In Persian).
Bagheri, K. (2008). Philosophy of education in Islamic republic of Iran (Vol. 1). Tehran: Elmi-Farhangi. (In Persian).
Bagheri, K. (2019). Lecture in Institute for Research on Education. Tehran. Retrieved from http://rabnews.ir/12467/. (In Persian).
Becker, M. (2018). On Immanent Critique in Hegel’s Phenomenology. Hegel Bulletin, pp. 1-23. 10.1017/hgl.2018.8.
Behrangi, S. (1967). An examination of educational problems in Iran. Tehran: Shabgir press. (In Persian).
Brittain, C. C. (2010). Adorno and theology. London: T & T Clark International.
Buchwalter, A. (1987). Hegel, Adorno and the concept of transcendent critique. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 12 (4), 297-328.
Celikates, R. (2012). Karl Marx: Critique as emancipatory practice. In K. de Boer & R. Sonderegger (Eds.), Conceptions of critique in modern and contemporary philosophy (pp. 101-118). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Finlayson, J. G. (2014). Hegel, Adorno and the origins of immanent criticism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22 (6), 1142-1166.
Haggerson, N. L. (1991). Philosophical inquiry: Ampliative criticism. In E. C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry (pp. 43-60). Albany: State university of New York press
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit. A. V. Miller (Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2000), ‘On the Essence of Philosophical Criticism Generally, and its Relationship to the Present State of Philosophy in Particular’. H. S. Harris (Trans.) in G. di Giovanni (ed.), Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post- Kantian Idealism, pp. 275–291. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Hemmatifar, M. (2020). The main problem of the Iranian educational system is being imported. Retrieved from http://rabnews.ir/13352/. (In Persian).
Honneth, A. (2001). Reconstructive Social Critique with a Genealogical Reservation: On the Idea of Critique in the Frankfurt School. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 22 (2), 3-11.
Horkheimer, M. (1972). Traditional and critical theory. In his Critical theory: Selected essays. M. J. O’Connell(Trans.). pp. 188-252. New York: Herder and Herder.
Karimi, A. (2016). Education against education. Tehran: Ghadiyani.
Marx, K. (1978). The Marx-Engels reader. R. C. Tucker (Ed.). London: Norton.
Marx, K. (1997). Writings of young Marx on Philosophy and society. D. Easton & K. H. Guddat (Eds.). Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.
Mirarab Razi, R. (2015). Explaining the Reasons for Failure of Educational Reform and Resistance by Teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(38), 159-178. (In Persian).
Miri, S. J., Khorami Nejad, M. (2019). A critical study of education policy making in modern Iran. Tehran: Naghd-e Farhang.
Mousapour, N. (2012). Approaches that govern change in Iran’s education system and curriculum; from the engineering approach to cultural approach. Rahbord Farhang ,5(Issue 17-18), 243-273. (In Persian).
Nazari, M. (2018). Is School Dead? (Marg -e Madreseh?). Tehran: Mashghe Shab. (In Persian).
Overseas Consultants Inc. (1949). Report On Seven Year Development Plan for The Plan Organization of the Imperial Government of Iran. New York.
Popper, K. (2001). The open society and its enemies. E. Fooladvand (Trans.). Tehran: Kharazmi publishing Inc. (In Persian).
Popper, K. R. (2013). The open society and its enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sadeghzadeh, A. (2019). Lecture in Institute for Research on Education. Tehran. Retrieved from http://rabnews.ir.
Sarkar Arani, M. (2019). Japan from the viewpoint of comparative studies in education. Retrieved from https://rabnews.ir/11862. (In Persian).
Stahl, T. (2013). What is Immanent Critique? SSRN Working Papers, URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2357957, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2357957.
Supreme Council of Education (2000). Aims of primary and secondary education. Tehran: Supreme Council of Education. (In Persian).
Supreme Council of Education (2018). Aims of public education in different levels. Tehran: Supreme Council of Education. (In Persian).
Theoretical foundations of changing public education in Islamic Republic of Iran. (2011). Tehran: Supreme council of education. (In Persian).
Toosi, M. A. (1963). The organization of education and its leadership. Tehran: Tehran Mosavvar. (In Persian).
Wise, A. E. (1977). Why Educational Policies Often Fail: The Hyperrationalization Hypothesis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 9(1), 43-57.
ارجاع به مقاله
وحدتی دانشمندع. (2020). نقد درونی نظام آموزشی؛ بازخوانی آرای هگل، مارکس و آدورنو. پژوهش‌نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت, 10(1), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.22067/fedu.v10i1.87435
نوع مقاله
پژوهشی