واکاوی موضع گیری دیدگاه های فلسفی پیرامون مفهوم صدای دانش آموز در برنامه درسی و استخراج دلالت های تربیتی آن

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• محدثه خطاط ¹
• مرضیه دهقانی ²
• رضوان حکیم زاده ³
• کیوان صالحی ²
• مرضیه عالی ⁴

¹ دانشجو دکتری برنامه درسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

² دانشیار، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

³ استاد تمام برنامه ریزی درسی و عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

⁴ استادیار، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

10.22067/fedu.2025.91048.1390

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به تحلیل مفهوم صدای دانش‌آموز از منظر دیدگاه‌های مختلف فلسفه تربیت می‌پردازد و در پی آن است که موضع‌گیری آنها را با مفروضه‌های مفهوم صدای دانش‌آموز سنجیده و دیدگاهی منطبق با مفروضه‌های صدای دانش‌آموز انتخاب نماید. این پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و روش نقد فلسفی انجام شد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که هر یک از رویکردهای فلسفی (اگزیستانسیالیسم، پراگماتیسم، کنش ارتباطی هابرماس، پداگوژی انتقادی، پست‌مدرنیسم و کنش متقابل نمادین، عاملیت) به جنبه‌ای از مفهوم صدای دانش‌آموز بیشتر توجه دارند و آن را به‌عنوان ابزاری برای تقویت استقلال، قدرت و مشارکت آن‌ها در محیط آموزشی تفسیر می‌کنند. بررسی این دیدگاه‌ها نشان می‌دهد که موضع‌گیری هر یک با مفروضه‌های صدای دانش‌آموز چگونه بوده و چطور می‌توانند به ارتقاء نقش صدای دانش‌آموز در برنامه‌های درسی کمک کنند. تحلیل مقایسه‌ای نشان داد که نظریه عاملیت به دلیل تأکید بر نقش فعال و تعاملی دانش‌آموز، توجه به بافت فرهنگی- اجتماعی، پویایی قدرت و اصالت فردی در بهبود یادگیری، بیشترین همخوانی با مفروضه‌های صدای دانش‌آموز را داراست. این نظریه بر توانمندسازی دانش‌آموزان، مشارکت دموکراتیک و ایجاد فرصت‌هایی برای بیان نظرات و اثرگذاری آن‌ها در فرآیند آموزشی تمرکز می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• صدای دانش‌آموز
• فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت
• نظریه عاملیت
• برنامه‌درسی

موضوعات

• فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت

---

مراجع

Ahmadi, R. (2023). Student voice, culture, and teacher power in curriculum co-design within higher education: An action-based research study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT, 28(2), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1923502

Alipour, F., & Alipour, F. (2018). The Epistemology of Existentialism and Its Implications for Education. Journal of Educational and Social Studies of Quran and Atrat, 1(1), 103-. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2182916  (In Persian)

Anwari, M. R. (2012). Criticism and Analysis of the Theory of Symbolic Interaction. Marifat, 20(8), 153-. https://www.magiran.com/paper/939535  (In Persian)

Ashari, Z., & Hasani, M. (2016). Explanation and Criticism of Moral Agency in Social Cognitive Learning Theory. Journal of Islamic Perspective on Educational Science, 2(2), 93-. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1482056  (In Persian)

Babakhani, S., & Rashtiani, M. (2023). An Introduction to the Philosophical-Educational Thoughts of Jürgen Habermas and Explaining Its Implications for Education (Objectives, Principles and Methods). Journal of New Strategies in Psychology and Educational Sciences, 5(15), 1-14. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2547725  (In Persian)

Bagheri Noaparast, K. (2016). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Vol. One). Scientific and Cultural Publications. (In Persian)

Bagheri Noaparast, K. (2019). Human agency, a religious and philosophical approach. Vakavash Publications. https://roshdpress.ir/product/%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%B1%D9%88%DB%8C%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%86%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D9%81%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%81%DB%8C/  (In Persian)

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 604). Freeman. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7953477/mod_resource/content/1/Self-Efficacy_%20The%20Exercise%20of%20Control.pdf

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23964

Beane, J. A. (2024). ‘Because it’s your education, not mine’: a retrospective on student voice in curriculum decisions and school policy. Education 3-13, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2332860

Behbahanipour, A., & Sharafuddin, S. H. (2023). A critical evaluation of the approaches of the symbolic interaction school. Socio-Cultural Knowledge Journal, 14(3), 47-57. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2621867  (In Persian)

Bland, D., & Sharma-Brymer, V. (2012). Imagination in school children's choice of their learning environment: An Australian study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 56, 75-88. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.06.002

Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Univ of California Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=HVuognZFofoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Symbolic+interactionism:+Perspective+and+method&ots=4pReD4BV6C&sig=pcT98rAhIyzWWXBwdXbnLSfs0W0

Bragg, S., & Manchester, H. (2012). Pedagogies of Student Voice: Pedagogías de la voz del alumnado. Ministerio de Educación. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=gllDCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&dq=Pedagogies+of+Student+Voice:+Pedagog%C3%ADas+de+la+voz+del+alumnado&ots=hB_Weo9ePD&sig=81cUQEZ_3QM9aHzg4PclHkRHPq8

Bron, J., Emerson, N., & Kákonyi, L. (2018). Diverse student voice approaches across Europe. European Journal of Education, 53(3), 310-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12285

Busher, H. (2012). Students as expert witnesses of teaching and learning. Management in Education, 26(3), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020612445679

Castro-Zubizarreta, A., & Calvo-Salvador, A. (2024). Child participation in early childhood education in Spain: When having rights does not mean being able to exercise them. POLICY FUTURES IN EDUCATION, 22(4), 642-658. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/14782103231180665

Conner, J. (2015). Student voice: A field coming of age. Youth Voice Journal, 5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281825150_Student_voice_A_field_coming_of_age

Cook-Sather, A. (2018). Listening to equity-seeking perspectives: How students’ experiences of pedagogical partnership can inform wider discussions of student success. Higher education research & development, 37, 923-936. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1457629

Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory into practice, 59(2), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091

Cook-Sather, A., & Matthews, K. (2023). Practising student voice in university teaching and learning: three anchoring principles. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.6.2

Esteban, M. B. (2022). Children’s Participation, Progressive Autonomy, and Agency for Inclusive Education in Schools. Social Inclusion, 10(2), 43-53. https://doi.org/doi:10.17645/SI.V10I2.4936

Farahbakhsh, H., Bagheri, K., & Sajadieh, N. (2022). Study and Critique of the relationship between culture and education regarding agency in the education Documents of Iran. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 6(2), 29-54. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2500819  (In Persian)

Farahbakhsh, H., Bagheri Noaparast, K., Sajjadieh, N. S., & Monadi, M. (2022). A critique of Pierre Bourdieu's view on the relationship between agency and culture in the area of education based on the Islamic theory of action. Foundations of Education, 11(2), 5-30. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2640979  (In Persian)

Fernandez, L., Heng, M. A., & Kim Eng, C. L. (2022). Voices on “voice”: A juxtaposition of teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the possibilities and challenges of student voice in teaching and learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2037512

Fielding, M. (2007). Beyond “Voice”: New roles, relations, and contexts in researching with young people. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458780

Flynn, P., & Hayes, N. (2021). Student Voice in Curriculum Reform: Whose Voices, Whose Listening? In Curriculum change within policy and practice: Reforming second-level education in Ireland (pp. 43-59). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paula-Flynn/publication/348221207_Student_Voice_in_Curriculum_Reform_Whose_Voices_Who%27s_Listening/links/60c1e9e892851ca6f8d72187/Student-Voice-in-Curriculum-Reform-Whose-Voices-Whos-Listening.pdf

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (MB Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum, 2007. https://books.google.com/books/about/Pedagogy_of_the_Oppressed.html?id=M4MQAAAAYAAJ

Gagnon, L. (2024). Student Agency in Action.  Retrieved from https://aurora-institute.org/cw_post/student-agency-in-action/

Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism's war on higher education. Haymarket Books. https://www.amazon.com/Neoliberalisms-Higher-Education-Henry-Giroux/dp/1608463346

Gordon, C., & Foucault, M. (1980). Selected interviews and other writings 1972− 1977. Pantheon Books. https://www.academia.edu/download/59017587/Foucault__M_-_Power_Knowledge_Pantheon__198020190424-25150-1kti2b5.pdf

Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2016). From data source to co-researchers? Tracing the shift from ‘student voice ’ to student–teacher partnerships in Educational Action Research. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1053507

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press. English edition. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955926

Habermas, J. (1987). A theory of communicative action (Vol 2: Life world and systems critique of functionalist reason)(T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. https://archive.org/details/lifeworld-and-system-a-critique-of-functionalist-reason-jurgen-habermas-thomas-m_202402/Lifeworld%20and%20System_%20A%20Critique%20of%20Functionalist%20Reason%20--%20J%C3%BCrgen%20Habermas%2C%20Thomas%20McCarthy%20--%20The%20Theory%20of%20Communicative%20Action%2C%20Vol%202%2C%201985%20--%209780807014011%20--%20b85cb037e8a18d4efd6c017c943a3742%20--%20Anna%E2%80%99s%20Archiv

Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500017527

Haji-Akhoundi, Z., Emam-Jomeh, S. M. R., & Sarmadi, M. R. (2011). Explain the key elements of the curriculum based on the concepts introduced by Freire. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 5, 142-171. https://www.magiran.com/p890430  (In Persian)

Klemenčič, M. (2023). A theory of student agency in higher education. In Research Handbook on the Student Experience in Higher Education (pp. 25-40). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204193.00010

Lodge, C. (2005). From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 6, 125-146. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10833-005-1299-3.pdf

Mazaheri, H. (2020). A Comparison between the Valuation Principles of Pragmatic Educational Philosophy and those of the Document of Fundamental Transformation of the IRI Educational System. Scientific Journal of Islamic Education, 28(46), 167-198. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2149830  (In Persian)

McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for social justice: The role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429

McCombs, B. L. (2003). A framework for the redesign of K-12 education in the context of current educational reform. Theory into practice, 42(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4202_2

McLaren, P. (2015). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633640

Mead, G. H. (2015). Mind, self & society. University of Chicago Press.

Messiou, K. (2023). The role of students’ voices in promoting inclusive education. In the International Encyclopedia. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/455453

Mirgol, A., Keshtiaray, N., & Saadatmand, Z. (2023). Analysis of the learning discourse in critical pedagogy with emphasis on the views of Paolo Freire. Training & Learning Researches, 19(1), 117-142. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2614681  (In Persian)

Mokhtari, M., & Jabbar, M. (2023). Hossein Nasr’s Sociological Analysis of the Concept of Self concerning the Sociology of Symbolic Interaction. Social theories of Muslim thinkers, 13(3), 49-64. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2682557  (In Persian)

Moreno-Romero, C., Enn, Ü., Savvani, S., & Pantazis, A. (2024). Educational commons facilitating student voice: an ethnographic approach. Education 3-13, 52(6), 891-910. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/03004279.2024.2331952

Nelson, E. (2017). Re-thinking power in student voice as games of truth: dealing/playing your hand. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 25(2), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1238839

O'Sullivan, M., & MacPhail, A. (2010). ‘Carving a new order of experience’with young people in physical education: Participatory Action Research as a pedagogy of possibility. In Young People's Voices in Physical Education and Youth Sport (pp. 175-197). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203881897-18/carving-new-order-experience-young-people-physical-education-participatory-action-research-pedagogy-possibility

OECD. (2013). Student Agency: Learning for the Future. OECD Publishing https://www.oecd.org/education/student-agency-learning-for-the-future.htm

OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030 https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

OECD. (2019). Trends Shaping Education 2019 https://www.oecd.org/education/trends-shaping-education-22187049.htm

Perry-Hazan, L. (2021). Conceptualising conflicts between student participation and other rights and interests. Discourse, 42(2), 184-198. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/01596306.2019.1599324

Ramezani, A., Imani Naini, M., & Ghaderi, M. (2019). An analytical study of Habermas's principles of moral education and their criticism from the perspective of Quranic ethics. Journal of Quranic Studies, 9(36), 333-351. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1967523 (In Persian)

Raunić, R. (2017). Filozofija i kurikul. Metodički ogledi: časopis za filozofiju odgoja, 24(1), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.21464/mo45.124.930

Reay, D. (2018). Working class educational transitions to university: The limits of success. European Journal of Education, 53(4), 528-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12298

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teachers' expectations and pupils' intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://people.wku.edu/steve.groce/RosenthalJacobson-PygmalionintheClassroom.pdf

Sarmadi, M. R., & Masoomifard, M. (2018). Epistemological analysis of existentialism and its educational implications in the distant education system (With emphasis on virtual education). Research in School and Virtual Learning, 5(20), 101-116. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1866089 (In Persian)

Stubley, E. V. (2021). Philosophy as a Method of Inquiry. Visions of Research in Music Education, 16(3), 8. https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1687&context=vrme

Suleiman Nejad, A., Sarmadi, M. R., & Azizi, A. (2011). The Comparative Analysis of Instructional Objects in Pragmatism and Islam. Iranian Journal of Knowledge Studies in The Islamic University, 14(1), 103-. https://www.magiran.com/paper/869681

Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution. (2011). Fundamental Transformation Document of Education. https://sccr.ir/Files/6609.pdf (in Persian)

Supreme Council of Education. (2012). National Curriculum Document of the Islamic Republic of Iran. https://bayanbox.ir/info/1800233674260427126/%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%D9%87-%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%B3-%D9%85%D9%84%DB%8C (In Persian)

Taylor, C., & Robinson, C. (2009). Student voice: Theorising power and participation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(2), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360902934392

Weisi, H., & Ahmadi, R. (2024). Conceptualizing student voice in teacher-student curriculum partnerships within Iran's higher education. Higher education, 87(3), 795-812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01036-6

Woolner, P., Hall, E., Wall, K., & Dennison, D. (2007). Getting together to improve the school environment: user consultation, participatory design, and student voice. Improving Schools, 10(3), 233-248. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/1365480207077846

Zarvandi, J. (2022). A Comparative Look at the Education of Values in the Two Perspectives of Islam and Existentialism. Journal of Quran and social science, 1(3), 51-88. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2437573 (In Persian)