The Analysis of the Meaning of Teacher’s Activism in the Articles of the Journal of “Roshd-e Mo’alem” (According to Fairclough’s Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis)

Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

• Marzieh Aali ¹
• Ayoob davoodi ²

¹ University of Tehran

² university of Tehran

10.22067/fedu.v9i1.79007

Abstract

This research aimed to analyze the discourse of teacher’s activism in the articles of “Roshd-e Mo’alem” published from 2011 to 2017. As such, the method of Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis (CDA) was applied. Regarding Fairclough’s three dimensional models of CDA, it was attempted to describe and analyze teacher’s activism according to the articles of “Roshd-e Mol’alem,” and finally, to clarify the relationship of this discourse and the social situation. Textual components including achieving the same skills, enjoying teachers’ rights in exchange for skills achievement, measuring teacher’s performance with quantitative indicators, being at the service of development, government and society, being influenced by family demands, meeting quantitative criteria, being accountable for the expectations of society, having the role of convincing were the findings of the research in the description level that formed teacher’s activism. Also, in the interpretation level, overcoming the functionalist approach and overcoming quantitative approach on culture, prioritizing the mechanical approach and development to freedom, domination of the logic of market, domination of centralism, considering teachers as a class and neglecting critical thinking in the domain of culture were the answers given to the above questions. In the explanation level, the findings include the situation of development-driven modernization in Iran, overcoming a specific image of a typical citizen, the presumption of cultural confrontation with other nations, treating contemporary society as an ill and quantity-oriented approach in the social and cultural arena.

Keywords

• critical discourse analysis
• Activism, Teacher
• roshde moalem
• functionalism

---

References

Ghasemi Pouya, I. (2008). Explaining and Analyzing the Characteristics of Successful Schools in Contemporary Iranian Education, Education, 96, 239-201. (In persiam).

Aghagolzadeh, F. (2007). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Discourse Analysis Genesis in Linguistics, Tehran: Elmifarhangi. (In Persian)

Bukhari, N. H. & Xiao yang, W. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and educational research. IOSR. Research & Method in Education، 3(1), 9-17.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.

Froom, E. (2012). The Hope Revolution. Morvarid Publications, sixth Edtion

Ghaeeminia, Ali-Asghar (2013). Iranian Noe Liberalism, A Notion of the Political Economy of the Islamic Republic. Social Sciences Monthly, 53- 54, 21-24. (In Persian)

Ghasemi-Puya, E. (2008). Clarification and Analysis of the properties of the successful schools the contemporary Education System of Iran. Education and Training, 96, 201-239 (In Persian)

Haydari, A. (2018). Psychology, Government and Neoliberalism. Sociological Studies, 50, 9-40. (In Persian)

Hosseinipakdehi, A., Heidari, A. & Moradian Y. (2015). A Discourse Analysis of the Research Literature of the Iranins’ Cultural Identity. Intercultural Studies, 28, 65-100. (In Persian)

Howarth, D. (1998). Discourse Theory (A. A. Soltani, Trans.). Political Sciences Journal, 1, (2) .156-183.

Irvani, Sh. (2015). An Introduction to Clarification of the nature of the Educational System of Iran since the Beginning of the Modernization Period. The journal of foundations of education, 4 (1), 83-110. (In Persian)

Jafari, Z. (2010). A Series of Qualitative Methods in the Behavioral Sciences. Discourse Analysis, Social Sciences, 25, 64-75. (In Persian)

Jahangiri, J. & Bandarrigizadeh, A. (2012): The Language of Power and Ideology in the critical approach of Norman Fairclough toward the Discourse Analysis, Theoretical Politics Research, 14, 57-820. (In Persian)

Jørgensen, M. W. & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. Sage.

Karimian, A. (1999). New Iranian Schools from 1286 to 1308, Nameh Parsi, 3, 92-107. (In Persian)

Malju, M. (2006). Downsizing the Iranian Government, Truth logic or Power speech, Dialoge, 45, 25-48. (In Persian)

Mir-Arab Razi, R. (2013). Clarification of the Role of Teaching Culture in Confrontation with Change and Innovation in Class Programs (A case Study of the Science Course in Elementary School), Ph.D Dissertation, Tarbiat Modarres University. (In Persian)

Mohammadi, H., Zibakalam-Mofrad, F. (2014). Neo Liberalism and Commercialization of Education, A Challenge for the ethical education. Education and training Essentials Research Journal, 4 (8), 95-116. (In Persian)

Mohammadi, M. (2014). A Geneology of the New Education in Iran, Birth of School, PhD Dissertation. Tarbiat Modarres University. (In Persian)

Mohammadpur, A. (2011). Meta method; the Philosophical and Practical Essentials of the compositional Research Method in the Social and Bahavioral Sciences, Tehran. Sociologists Publications, (In Persian)

Rahbari, M. (2010). The Elite and the Formation of the Development Discourse in Iran. Laws and Politics Research, 9, 22, 41-66. (In Persian)

Ranjbar, H., Haghdost, A., Salsali, M., Khosdel, A., Solaimani, A., Bahrami, N. (2012). Sampling in qualitive research: getting started. Scientific journral of the Islamic repaublic of Iran. 10 (3), 238-250. (In Persian)

Rogers، R. (Ed.). (2011). An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. Routledge.

Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M. Hui, D. & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of educational research, 75(3), 365-416.

Rossi, T. Tinning, R. McCuaig, L. Sirn, K. & Hunter، L. (2009). With the best of intentions: A critical discourse analysis of physical education curriculum materials. Journal of teaching in physical education. 28(1), 75-89.

Sarap, M. (2003). An Introduction to post Structuralism and Post Modernism. (M.R. Tajik, Trans.), Ney Publications. (In Persian).

Shoayri, H., R. (2010). From the Structural Semiotics to Discourse Semiotics-Semantics, Literary Criticism, Course 2, 8, 33-51. (In Persian)

Tavakkoli Toroghi, M. (2003). Tajaddud- Bumi va Bazandishi-i Tarikh :Vernacular Mdernity and the Rethinking of History.Tehran, Iran: Nashri Tarikh- Iran. (In Persian)

Thomas, S. (2005). Taking teachers out of the equation: Constructions of teachers in education policy documents over a ten-year period. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 45-62.

Vajargah, K., Diba, T. (2002). A study of the properties of a good Citizen for Iranian Society and the rate of Conformity of educational programs to these properties, Cognition, 35, 35-62. (In Persian)

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society 4(2), 249-283.

Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Sage.

Zakaolmolk, M. A. (2006). Forughi’s Articles. Tus Publications. Third Edition. (In Persian)