Essential Foundations, Goals and Themes of Social Studies Curriculum in Primary School based on Critical Theory of Horkheimer and Philosophy for Children(P4C) Program

Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Tehran University

2 Professor, Tehran University

3 Assistant Prof., Tehran University

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the critical theory of Horkheimer and P4C program in order to present a program for incorporating critical thinking in social studies curriculum. The main question of the study concerns the important capacities of the two approaches for incorporating critical thinking in social studies curriculum. Using a mixed-methods desgin, the foundations and principles of the curriculum were formulated, and then through the application of deductive methodology the major themes were identified and presented. The results of the study illustrated that deduction of foundations rest on four aspects called ontology, anthropology, epistemology and axiology taking into account the the afore-mentioned theoretical approaches and the hard core is P4C program.
In this paper was argued that the goals of the curriculum originate from the goals underlying the two approaches which include the following: educating activist citizen, educating personal and social responsibility morale, attaining the ability for establishing true social relationships, develping the ability of conscious and logical criticism of social acts, developing the ability of judging the aims and functions of social institutes, and developing comprehensive thinking orientations in idenfigying social problems. Also, the following seven essential themes in the curriculum were presented: recognition of basic social concepts, awareness of the reason why these concept should be explicit, getting to know effective social institutes, identification of effective social factors, recognition of natural and unnatural factors influencing the destiny of society, getting to know criteria and their functions, and distinguishing between personal and social aims.

Keywords


Abromeit, J. (2011). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School, Cambridge et al. (Cambridge University Press) 2011, 457 pp.
Ahmadi, B. (2013). Memories of Darkness: About the Three Thinkers of the Frankfurt School, Walter Benjamin, Max Horkheimer, Theodore Adorno. In: Tehran: Markaz. (In Persian).
Ahmadzade, Z. (2015). Investigating the Components of Critical Thinking in Social Studies Curriculum in Six Grade. Birjand University; MA Thesis. (In Persian).
Asadi, F. (2008). The Necessity of Critical Thinking and Criticism and Examination of its Realization in the Secondary Schools of Tehran from the Teachers' Viewpoint. Alzahra University; MA Thesis. (In Persian).
Bagheri, K. S., Narges. Tavassoli, Tahere. (2010). Approaches and Research Methods in Philosophy of Education. . Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. (In Persian).
Ekrami, B. (2014). Investigating the Position of Critical Thinking Components in Elementary Sixth Grade Textbooks. Shahid Rajaei University. MA Thesis. (in Persian).
Farasatkhah, M. (2012). We Iranian; the Historical and Social Background of Iranian People Tehran: Ney. (In Persian).
Fereidouni, N. (2012). The Place of Critical Thinking in the Philosophy and Logic Curriculum in High School. Payam Noor University; MA Thesis. (in Persian).
Halpern, D. F. (2003). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking: Psychology Press.
Horkheimer, M. (1947). Eclipse of Reason. Seabury Press.
Horkheimer, M. (1968). Critical Theory, Selected Essays. ( Matthew J. O’connel and Others Trans). The Continuum Publishing Company.
Jay, M. (1973). The dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950 (Vol. 10): Univ of California Press.
Lau, J. Y. (2011). An introduction to critical thinking and creativity: Think more, think better: John Wiley & Sons.
Lipman, M. (1988a). Social Inquiry. Montclair State University Press.
Lipman, M. (1988b). Critical Thinking–What Can It Be. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38-43.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education: Cambridge university press.
Miller, P. (2005 ). Subject, Conquest and Power in the Look of Horkheimer, Marcuse, Habermas and Foucault. (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh Trans.). Tehran: Ney. (In Persian).
Ministry of Education, M. o. (2006). Guide for Social Studies Curriculum for Public Education Course. Department of Social Studies, Office of Planning and Textbook Writing
Ordoukhani, M. (2015). Social Studies at the End of Range; Social Studies Place in its Educators Opinion. Social Science Education Growth Journal. No.1. (In Persian).
Oscanyan, F. S., Lipman, M., & Sharp, A. M. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom: Temple University.
Peyravi, F. (2012). Quantitative Analysis of Critical Thinking Components in the Social Studies Curriculum in High School. Marvdasht Azad University: MA Thesis. (In Persian).
Safaeipour, H. (2015). Smartthinking; the Ability of Comprehension and Evaluation of Reason. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (in Persian).
Sattari, A. (2011). Studying and Criticizing Philosophy for Children Based on the Philosophical Foundations of Islamic Education. Tehran University; Ph.D. Thesis. (In Persian).
Sharp, A. M. (1993). The Community of Inquiry: Education for Democracy. Thinking Children and Education. . In Montclair State College. Kendall/ Hunt Publication Company. (pp. 241-250): Routledge.
Valizadeh, H. (2011). Content Analysis of Secondary School Social Sciences Textbooks and the Method of Teaching Secondary Social Science Teachers Based on Critical Thinking Elements. Mazandaran University; MA Thesis. (In Persian).
Yavari, S. a. (2013). Evaluation of Components of Middle School Social Sciences Curriculum and Adaptation to UNESCO Defined Citizenship Skills. Azad University; MA Thesis. (in Persian).
Zarghami, S. (2015). The Relationship between Philosophy of Education and Philosophy for Children. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (In Persian).
CAPTCHA Image