Subsuming Unity of Reason and Religion and its Heuristics for Religious Education

Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

• Khosrow Bagheri ¹
• Narges Sajadieh ²
• Mohamad Khodayarifard ³
• Azad Mohammadi ⁴
• Abdorrahim Gavahi ⁵
• Saeed Akbari Zardkhaneh ⁶

¹ Prof./ University of Tehran

² Assistant Prof./ University of Tehran

³ Prof./University of Tehran

⁴ University of Tehran

⁵ Prof./World Religion Research Center Tehran

⁶ Assistant Prof./Shahid Beheshti University

10.22067/fedu.2021.30914.0

Abstract

The relationship between religion and rationality has been a controversial issue. Its implications are not limited to the realm of ideas but have extended to the social and political aspects. In this article, the relation between religion and reason has been examined inspired by the Islamic views. Two approaches have been considered: maximal rationalism and minimal rationalism (fideism). These two extreme views have been criticized for paving the path for examining religion, rationality, and relationships. This article consists of a subsumptive unity in which religion and reason are taken in a whole-part relationship. Accordingly, each part of religion is either in principle or in practice reasonable. We have argued that rationality is more expansive and encompasses religion. Finally, the implications of this view for religious education are explored. These include reasonable explanations of religious teachings, drawing pupils’ attention to the boundaries of reason, tolerating temporary cognitive and practical suspension of judgments, highlighting dialogue, and fostering critical questions.

Keywords

• maximal rationalism
• minimal rationalism
• subsumptive unity
• religious education

---

References

Abdoljabbar, Ben Ahmad (1996). The explanation of five principles. Commented by Imam Ahmad Ebne Alhosein be Abi Hashem. Ghahirah: Maktab Vahabeh. ( In Arabic)

Astarabadi, Mola Mohammad Amin (2003). Favaedol Madinah. Qom: Islamic Press Instituttion. {In Arabic)

Bagheri, Khosrow (2003). The identity of religious science: An epistemological look at the relationship between religion and human sciences. Tehran: Sazman Inteshar. (In Persian)

Bagheri, Khosrow (2013). The calculation of religious science within the religious knowledge geometry: A critique on Javadi Amoli’s view, Book Review Journal, 15(69), 76-127. (In Persian).

Bagheri, Khosrow (2015). A second look at the Islamic education, Vol. 2, Tehran: Madreseh Press. (In Persian).

 Bahniafar, Mehdi & Mokhtari, Hamideh (2016). Motahari’s philosophical approach to the question of the relation of reason and religion. Wisdom and Philosophy, 11(4), 79-94. (In Persian).

Ghorbani Sini, Ali & Akbari, Fathali (2014). Double Truth and Averroes’s Theory of Material Intellect. Philiosophy and Kalam, 47 (2), 232- 309. (In Persian).

 Gilson, Etienne (1998). Reason and revelation in the Middle Ages. (Shahram Pazooki, trans.). Tehran: Garoos.

Hakimi, Mohamadreza (2012). The dignity of reason, collectors: Mohamadkazem Haidari & Mohamad Esfandiari, Tehran: Negaresh Printing House. (In Persian).

Ibn Rushd, Mohammad Ibn Ahmad (1986). The decisive treatise, determining the nature of the connection between religion and philosophy. Beirut: Darolmashregh. (In Arabic).

 Javadi Amoli, Abdolah, (2007). The dignity of reason in the religious knowledge geometry. Ghom: Asra Publisher. (In Persian).

Jie, Lu & Desheng, Gao (2004). New directions in the moral education curriculum in Chiness primary schools. Journal of Moral Education, 33(4), 495-510.

MacKay, D. M. (1974). Complementarity in scientific and theological thinking. Zygon, Journal of Religion and Science 9 (3).

Madanifar, Mohamadreza (2016). Faith, doubt and religious education. Biquarterly Journal of Philosophy of education, 1(1). 91-114. (In Persian).

Masoudi, Jahanghir. (2015). The hermeneutical dialectic of reason and religion: A new view on the relation between reason and religion. Journal of Research on Philosophy of Religion, 26, 178-196. (In Persian). 

Peterson, M.; Hasker, W.; Reichenbuch, B. & Basinger, D. (2012). Reason and religious belief: An introduction to the philosophy of religion. London: Oxford. 

Rajabi, Mohammadreza & Kazemzadeh, Parvin (2013). The relation of reason and religion in the Motahari’s view. Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 10(3), 123-148. (In Persian)

Russell, Bertrand (2003). Mysticism and logic. Translation by Najaf Daryabandari, Tehran: Nahid.

Sajadieh, Narges; Toosian, Sara (2017). Understanding, Questioning and Class from the Perspective of Gadamer; Question-Based Explanation of the Teaching Process. Journal of Foundations of Education 6 (2): 41-62. (In Persian).

Sajadieh, Narges; Madanifar, Mihammadreza; Yari Dehnavi, Morad (2013). Analyzing Islamic Republic of Iran's educational philosophies based on thinking concept, Foundations of Education, 3(1), 159-180. (In Persian)

Sharif, Mian Mohamad (1983). The history of philosophy in Islam, (Nasrolah Porjavadi, trans.). Tehran: Academic Publishing Center. (In Persian).

Shahrestani, Mohammad Abdolkarim (1995). Sects and creeds. Examined by Amir Ali Mahna & Ali Hasan Faaoor. Beirut: Darolmaarefa. (In Arabic).

Vaezi, Ali (2007). Critical rationalism and criticizing it. Islamic Kalam, No (59), 91-105. (In Persian).

Vaezi, Asghar (2006). Dualistic truth: The relation between reason and Vahi from Ibn Rushd's View. Kheradname Hamshahri, No (10), 52-53. (In Persian).

Wisdom, J.O. (1987). Challengeability in modern science. Avebury: Aldershot.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2000). On Certainty, (Malek Hoseini, trans.). Tehran: Hermes Publisher.  (In Persian).

Whitehead, A. N. (1926). Religion in the making. Fordham University Press.