Forcing theory on data or emerging theory from data Theory building in humanities using grounded theory methodology

Document Type : مروری

Authors

1 ferdowsi

2 ferdowsi Uni

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to describe emergent approach of grounded theory methodology and then compare it with systematic approach. To do so, after describing emergent approach, it compare it with systematic one surrounding 5 axis: coding processes; sampling processes; paradigms; literature review and rigor considerations. The findings show that emergent approach in comparison with systematic approach is more accordance with grounded theory methodology bases and instead of forcing theory on data, consider emerging theory from data. Whereas, systematic approach is more attended because of its simplicity and its predetermined frameworks.

Keywords


دانایی فرد، حسن؛ مهدی الوانی و عادل آذر. (1391). روش شناسی پژوهش کیفی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع. تهران: انتشارات صفار، چاپ اول.
Danaee Fard, H., Alvani, M., & Azar, A. (2012). Methodology of qualitative research inmanagement: a comprehensive approach. Tehran: Saffar.
Annells, M. (1996). Grounded theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism. Qualitative health research, 6(3), 379-393.
Devadas, U. M., Silong, A. D., & Ismail, I. A. (2011). The relevance of Glaserian and Straussian grounded theory approaches in researching human resource development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Financial Management and Economics.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23-38.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2007). Remodeling grounded theory. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung. Supplement 19(32), 47-68.
Glaser, B. G., & Hon. (2005). Staying open: the use of theoretical codes in grounded theory The Grounded Theory Review, 5(1), 1-20.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research: Aldine de Gruyter.
Jones, M., & Alony, I. (2011). Guiding the use of Grounded Theory in Doctoral studies–an example from the Australian film industry. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 95-114.
Kelle, U. (2007)." Emergence" vs." forcing" of empirical data? a crucial problem of grounded theory reconsidered. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung. Supplement, 6(2), 133-156 .
Kendall, J. (1999). Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(6), 743-757.
Kerr, N. M. (2011). Creating a protective picture: A grounded theory of how medical-surgical nurses decide to follow a "charting-by-exception" policy on a day-to-day, patient-by-patient basis. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
Locke, K. D. (2001). Grounded theory in management research: Sage Publications Limited.
Pidgeon, N. F., Turner, B.A. and Blockley, D.I. (1991). The use of grounded theory for conceptual analysis in knowledge elicitation, International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 35, 151-73.
Robrecht, L. (1995). Grounded theory: Evolving methods. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 169-177.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage Publ.
Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-642.
Turner, B. A. (1981). Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: one way of organizing the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory, Quality and Quantity, 15, 225-47.
CAPTCHA Image