A reflection on the Marketisation of education and the concept of "students as consumers"

Document Type : پژوهشی

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the present research is to examine marketization and the concept of "students as consumers" in education. To achieve this, the concept analysis method (concept structure evaluation) was employed. First, the theoretical foundations of marketization within neoliberalism, such as "Homo Economicus," "the market as a spontaneous order," and positive liberalism, were examined. In the second step, various elements of marketization in education were analyzed. Finally, marketization, particularly within Iran's educational system, was critiqued. The findings show that marketization involves expanding the model of Homo Economicus, a self-centered, competitive, utility-maximizing individual, to all social spheres, thereby subjecting these spheres to the rule of economic rationality. Neoliberal thinkers such as Gary Becker, Milton Friedman, and Friedrich Hayek view the market as a superior mechanism that guarantees conditions for free choice and competition across other social fields. Key aspects of marketization include commercialization, the commodification of knowledge, privatization, students as consumers, New Public Management (NPM), performance evaluation and quality assurance, standardization, and competitiveness. Critical reviews indicate that marketization, by fostering an audit culture and a quantitative approach to assessment, leads to the development of unequal power dynamics in educational institutions. Additionally, by reducing the relationship between teachers and students to a seller-consumer dynamic, it diminishes the traditional and religious values of knowledge and the role of the teacher. On the other hand, the anthropological foundations of marketization contradict the goals of Islamic education.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Amaral, A. (2009). Quality assurance and assessment in higher education: Recent trends. Research Seminar Oxford University.
Amit, V. (2000). The university as panopticon: Moral claims and attacks on academic freedom. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit culture: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, . Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/52394/1/32.pdf.pdf
Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (2000). The corporate university and the politics of education. The educational forum,
Bagheri, K. (2008). Introduction to philosophy of education of the islamic republic of iran (Vol. 1). Scientific and Cultural. https://www.gisoom.com
Bagheri, K. (2013). A reflection on the relationships of the culture of marketization of knowledge and the university. Journal of Educational Sciences, 19(2), 7-22. https://education.scu.ac.ir/article_10115_en.html (In Persian)
Bagheri, K. (2017). One dream and two beds; eliminating the tensions of the university and the humanities. Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. (In Persian)
Bagheri, K., Sajjadie, N., & Tavassoli, T. (2010). Approaches and methods in philosophy of education. Elmi & Farhangi Publication. (In Persian)
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0268093022000043065
Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of political economy, 101(3), 385-409. https://doi.org/10.1086/261880
Belfield, C., & Levin, H. (2002). Education privatization: Causes, consequences and planning implications fundamentals of educational planning. In: UNESCO-IIEP.
Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1981). The normative purpose of economic ‘science’: Rediscovery of an eighteenth century method. International Review of Law and Economics, 1(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(81)90013-2
Broucker, B., De Wit, K., & Leisyte, L. (2015). An evaluation of new public management in higher education. EAIR 37th Annual Forum in Krems, Austria.
Brown, R. (2011). The march of the market. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.https://www.academia.edu/download/50228064/Vision__values_and_international_excellence.pdf
Buchanan, J. (1984). Politic without romance: A sketch of positive public choice and its normative implications. In J. Buchanan & R. Tollison (Eds.), The theory of public choice. University of Michigan Press. https://press.umich.edu/pdf/9780472080410-ch1.pdf
Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The limit of liberty: Between anarchy and leviathan (Vol. 7). Liberty Fund. https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/1827/0102-07_LFeBk.pdf
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751
Foucault, M. (2015). The birth of the biopolitics. Nashre Ney Press. (In Persian)
Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and freedom (40th ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://ctheory.sitehost.iu.edu/resources/fall2020/Friedman_Capitalism_and_Freedom.pdf
Furedi, F. (2011). Introduction to the marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. In M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & E. Nixon (Eds.), The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. https://raggeduniversity.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/1_x_Mike-Molesworth-Richard-Scullion-Elizabeth-Nixon-The-Marketisation-of-Higher-Education-and-the-Student-as-Consumer-Routledge-2010.pdf
Hassani, M. (2024). A critique on the privitizaatin policy of public and formal education in the iran educational system. Foundations of Education, 13(2), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.22067/fedu.2024.84268.1290 (In Persian)
Hayek, F. A. (1988). The fatal conceit: The error of socialism. Routledge. https://www.mises.at/static/literatur/Buch/hayek-the-fatal-conceit.pdf
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). Postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester University Press. https://monoskop.org/images/e/e0/Lyotard_Jean-Francois_The_Postmodern_Condition_A_Report_on_Knowledge.pdf
Mohammadi, H. (2018). Iinvestigating the basic challenges of commercialization in iran's higher education system based on criticizing the anthropological foundations of the neoliberalism school and presenting an alternative concept Tehran University]. Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadi, H., Bagheri, K., Talkhabi, M., & Mirzamoohammadi, M. H. (2019). Education and "competitive entrepreneur"; reflection of transformation of the "homo economicus" from classical liberalism to neoliberalism. Foundations of Education, 8(2), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.22067/fedu.v8i2.72474 (In Persian)
Mohammadi, H., & Mirzamohammadi, M. H. (2020). New public management (npm) in the iranian higher education; a moral analysis. Ethics and Education, 15(1), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2019.1700453
Mohammadi, H., & Zibakalam, F. (2019). Neoliberalism and the rise of “accountability” in university: A reflection on the approach to university as a quasi-market institution. Strategy for Culture, 12(47), 127-149. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsfc.2019.103797
Mueller, D. C. (1976). Public choice: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(2), 395-433. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2722461
Munene, I. I. (2008). Privatising the public: Marketisation as a strategy in public university transformation. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740801903448
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: `mode 2' revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250
Oksala, J. (2013). Neoliberalism and biopolitical governmentality. In J. Nilsson & S. Wallenstein (Eds.), Foucault, biopolitics and governmentality (pp. 53-72). Sodertorn Philosophical Studies. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/neoliberalism-and-biopolitical-governmentality
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718
Oplatka, I., Foskett, N., & Hemsley–Brown, J. (2002). Educational marketisation and the head’s psychological well–being: A speculative conceptualisation. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 419 - 441. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-2-00212
Robertson, D. (2000). Students as consumers: The individualization of competitive advantage. In P. Scott (Ed.), Higher education re-formed. Falmer Press. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1016/S0952-8733(00)00030-1
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive accountability: The rise of audit culture in higher education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures. Routledge. https://www.academia.edu/download/39632257/rn-Audit_Cultures__Anthropological_Studies_2000_1_.pdf#page=70
Stone, R. (2016). A shady market in scientific papers mars iran’s rise in science. Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah7297
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). Privatisation of education. Teachers College Press. https://download.ei-ie.org/Docs/WebDepot/The_Privatization_of_Education.pdf
CAPTCHA Image