A Historical Analysis of Currere as an Autobiographical Course in Reconceptualist

Document Type : پژوهشی

Author

• mostafa Ghaderi

دانشگاه کردستان

10.22067/fe.v5i2.40967

Abstract

This research proceeded Historical analyzing of currere as autobiographical course in reconceptualist works. Therefore, reconceptualist works studied by discourse analyzing. Unit of analyzing was sentenced and its level was an explanation. In order to research questions data divided to four categories: Meaning of currere, methods of currere, stages of currere and politic and sociologic base in reconceptualism. The results showed that meaning of Currere at Reconceptualist works has come with different senses, so: biographical pathway, personal pathway, praxis, meta-ascendant challenges at universe, a kind of lived experience, thinking about past and regards to future, a model for curriculum research, self-conscious at work with self and another, complicated understanding of possibilities at curriculum as gender, culture, ethnic, bracketing of teacher and learning experiences, to touch experience of self and revision of school experiences. Also, self-story and autobiographies are a method of currere. Politic and sociologic base of a currere were individual and social reconstruction.

Keywords

• currere
• discourse analizing
• Reconceptualism

---

References

Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.

Greene, M. (1974). Cognition, consciousness and curriculum. Heightened consciousness, cultural revolutionand curriculum theory. In William Pinar (Ed.), The Reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchan.

Huebner, D. (1975). Curriculum as concern for man's temporality."Curriculum Theorizing: In William Pinar (Ed.), The Reconceptualists.Berkeley: McCutchan.

Lincoln, Y. S., and Denzin, N. K. (1994). The fifth moment. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 575–586). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Macmillan, K. (2006). Discourse analysis, A Prime. Retrieved from http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/palmquis/courses/discourse.html.

Miller, J. L. (1990). Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. Albany: State University Press of New York.

Mooney, R. L. (1957). The researcher himself. In Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Research for curriculum improvement, 1957 Yearbook (pp. 154–186). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Pinar, W. F. & Grumet, M.R. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

Pinar, W.F. (2004-2008). What is curriculum theory? London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc., Publishers.

Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., and Taubman, P. (1995). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.

Pinar, W. F. (1978). Notes on the curriculum field 1978. Educational Researcher, 7 (8), 5–12.

Pinar, W. F. (1994). Autobiography and an architecture of self, in autobiography, Politics and Sexuality, New York: Peter Lang.

Pinar, W. F. (2010). The next moment. In: Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum Studies Handbook. The Next Moment (pp. 528--533). NewYork: Routledge.

Pinar, W. F. (2005). Complicated conversation: Occasions for ‘intellectual breakthrough’ in the internationalization of curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies [Taiwan], 1(1), 1–26.

Pinar, W. F. (2003). International handbook of curriculum research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pinar, W.F. (2001). Response: Gracious submission. Educational Researcher. 28, 14-15.