Education and "Competitive Entrepreneur"; Reflection of Transformation of the "Homo Economicus" from Classical Liberalism to Neoliberalism

Document Type : پژوهشی

Authors

1 Tehran University

2 University of Tehran

3 Institution of Cognitive Science Studies

4 Shahed University

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to examine the evolution of the concept of "Homo Economicus" from the Classical Liberalism to Neoliberalism. In order to achieve this goal, conceptual analysis method (conceptual structure assessment) has been used. The study of the homo economicus from Liberalism to Neoliberalism indicates that although Classical Liberals, such as Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill, have been proposing the idea of an economic man, but in the Neoclassic economic school and, consequently, Neoliberalism, we are witnessing the emergence of a new conception of homo economicus as self-interested, rational, utility maximizer, and "competitive entrepreneur". While Neoliberals such as Gary Becker and James Buchanan advocate this notion of homo economicus, Friedrich Hayek proposes a different anthropological viewpoint that in some cases it is against the homo economicus. Hayek using theoretical foundation of cultural evolution and "spontaneous order", emphasizes on uncertainty, unequal and vague competition, and tradition as an efficient coordinator, and criticizes the human as rational agent in the Neoclassic economics. Neoliberalism, as a new "governmentality" based on the anthropological foundations (the combination of some Hayek's ideas with the homo economicus), has put into positive and controlling policies in educational institutions.

Keywords


Anger, E. (2007). Hayek and Natural Law. Routledge, Taylor and Francis
Ball, S. & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities, Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85-96
Ball, S. J. (2003). The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity, the Journal of Education Policy. 18(2), 215-228
Barnett, R. (2011). The marketised university: defending the indefensible, in: Mike Molesworth, Richard Scullion and Elizabeth Nixon (Eds). The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
Buchanan, J. & Geoffrey, B. (1984). The Normative Purpose of Economic Science: Rediscovery of an Eighteenth Century Method. In: Buchanan, J. and Tollison, R. (Eds.). The Theory of Public Choice, the University of Michigan Press
Buchanan, J. (1984). Politic without Romance: a Sketch of Positive Public Choice and its Normative Implications. In: Buchanan, James and Tollison, Robert(Ed) The Theory of Public Choice, The University of Michigan Press.
Coombs, J. & Daniels, R. (2009). Philosophical Inquiry; Conceptual Analysis. (K. Bagheri Trans.). In: Short, E. C. (Eds.). Methodology of Curriculum Studies. Tehran: SAMT Press (In Persian).
Cotoi, C. (2011). Neoliberalism: A Foucauldian Perspective, International Review of Social Research, 1(2), 109-124
Davies, B. & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20:3, 247-259
Donzelot, J. (2009). Mobilization of the Society. In Burchell, G; Gordon, C. & Miller, P. (Eds). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality the University of Chicago Press, 169-181.
Farrant, A. (2011). Introduction. In: Farrant, A. (Ed) Hayek, Mill and Liberal Tradition, London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
Fleetwood, S. (1995). Hayek's Political Economy. Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
Flew, T. (2012). Michel Foucault’s ’the birth of biopolitics’ and contemporary neo-liberalism debates. Thesis Eleven, 108(1), 44-65.
Foucault, M. (2015). The Birth of the Biopolitics. (R. Nejafzade Trans.). Tehran: Nashre Ney Press (In Persian)
Furedi, F. (2011). Introduction to the Marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer, in: Mike Molesworth, Richard Scullion and Elizabeth Nixon (Eds.). The Marketisation of Higher Education and the Student as Consumer, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group
Hayek, F. A. (2010). Studies on Abuse and Decline of the Reason, Edited by Bruce Caldwell, University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty. Edited by Ronald Hamowy, the University of Chicago Press
Hayek, F.A (1988). The Fatal Conceit: the Error of Socialism. London: Routledge
Hayek, F.A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. New York: Routledge Classic.
Muller, D. (1984). Public Choice: a Survey. In: Buchanan, J. and Tollison, R. (Eds) The Theory of Public Choice, The University of Michigan Press
Munene, I. (2008). Privatizing the public: marketization as a strategy in public university transformation, Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 13(1), 1-17
Olssen, M. & Codd, J. O'Neil, A. (2004). Education Policy: Globalization, Citizenship and Democracy. ‌London: Sage Publication.
Olssen, M. & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism, Journal of Education Policy, 20:3, 313-345.
Rapper, R. (2015). Academic Perceptions of Higher Education Assessment Processes in Neoliberal Academia, Critical Studies in Education,
Robertson, D. (2000). Students as Consumers: the Individualization of competitive advantage, in: Peter Scott (Ed). Higher Education Re-formed, London; Falmer Press
Shore, C. & Wright, S. (2000).Coercive Accountability: The rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education, In: Strathern, M. (Ed) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group: 57-90.
Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations, Part I, New York: Collier & Sons.
Strathern, M. (2000). Introduction: New Accountabilities. In Strathern, M. (Ed) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 1-19.
Zibakalam, F. & Mohammadi, H. (2017). From Liberal Educational School to Neoliberalism; a Critical Study. Tehran: University of Tehran Press (In Persian).
CAPTCHA Image