Bachelard, G. (1984). The New Scientific Spirit. (A. Goldammer, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press
Bachelard, G. (1999). La Psychanalyse du feeu. (J. Sattari, Trans.). Tehran: Toos Publishing. (In Persian)
Bachelard, G. (2002). The Formation of the Scientific Mind: A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge. (M. McAllester Jones Trans.). Manchester: Clinamen press
Bachelard, G. (2006). Bachelard, Epistemologie: textes choisis par Dominique Lecourt. (J. Sttari, Trans.). Tehran: Cultural Research Bureau. (In Persian)
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. (Balacheff, N. et al. Ed. & Trans.). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Cassirer, E. (1991). The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. (M. Moghen, Trans.). Tehran: Niloofar Publishing. (In Persian)
Chimisso, C. (2001). Gaston Bachelard: Critic of Science and Imagination. New York: Routledge
Chimisso, C. (2008). From Phenomology to Phenomenotechniqe: the Role of Early Twentieth-Centry Physics in Gaston Bachelarďs Philosophy. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci,. 39, 384-392
Cobern, W. W. (2000). The Nature of Science and the Role of Knowledge and Belief. Science and Education 9, 219-246
Gutting, G. (1987). Gaston Bachelarďs Philosophy of Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2)1(, 55-71
Karimi, H., Mazidi, M. & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2007) Reviewing the textbook of first grade middle school the perspective of the philosophy of science. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Shiraz University, 52, 112-136 (In Persian)
Kipnis, N. (2011). Errors in Science and their Treatment in Teaching Science. Sci & Educ., 20, 655-685
Kuhn, T. S. (2010). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (S. Zibakalam Trans.). Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)
Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn’s Impact on Science Education: What Lessons Can Be Learned? Sci Ed, 88, 90-118
Matthews, M. R. (Ed.) (2014). International Handbook of Research in History. Philosophy and Science Teaching. New York: Springer
Mortimer, E. F. (1995). Coceptual Change or Conceptual Profile Change? Science & Education, 4, 267-285
Matthews, M. R. (2015). Science Teaching: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science, New York: Routledge
Muller-Will, S. (2005). Early Mendelism and the subversion of taxonomy: epistemological obstacles an institutions. Stud. Hist. Biol. & Biomed. Scie., 36, 465-487
Niaz, M. (2014). Science Textbooks: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. International Handbook of Research in History. Philosophy and Science Teaching. New York: Springer, 1411-1441
Niknam, Z., Mehrmohammadi, M. & Fazeli, N., Fardanesh, H. (2011). Explanation to an anthropological approach to science education. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.), 5(19), 8-36
Niknam, Z., Mehrmohammadi, M., Fazeli, N. (2012). Learning in Role Its and Students Iranian of View World Scientific. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J.C.S.)., 7(26), 55-82
Seager, D. (2008). The Imperial Examinations and Epistemological Obstacles. Philosophica, 82, 55-85
Sensevy, G. (2008). An Epistemological Approach to Modeling: Case Studies and Implications for Science Teaching. Sci Ed, 92, 424-446
Taber, K. S. (2003). The Atom in the Chemistry Curriculum: Fundamental Concept, Teaching Model or Epistemological Obstacles. Foundations of Chemistry 5, 43-84
Tiles, M. (1984). Bachelard: Science and Objectivity. New York: Cambridge University Press
Tulis, M., Steuer, G & Dresel, M. (2016). Learning from Errors: A Model of Individual Processes. Frontline Learning Research, 4(2), 12-26
Waldegg, G. (2001). Ontological Convictions and Epistemological Obstacles in Bolzano’s Elementry Geometry. Science and Education, 10, 409-418
Zachos, P., Pruzek, R. & Hick, T. (2003). Approaching Error in Scientific Knowledge and Science Education. 7th International History, Philosophy of science and Science Teaching Conferen Proceeding, Winnipeg, 947-957, (https://acase.org/files/approachingerror.pdf)
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله