نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 فردوسی مشهد. دانشکده علوم تربیتی

2 دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش پاسخ به این سؤال است که تا چه حد عنوان‌ها و ارزش گذاری ارائه شده برای الگوهای برنامه درسی در مقاله «واکاوی الگوی مفهومی در حوزه برنامه درسی: نقدی بر پژوهش های انجام شده با رویکرد طراحی الگو در برنامه درسی»، با ماهیت موضوع‌های حوزه معرفتی برنامه درسی منطبق می-باشد؟ و آنگاه با توجه به منابع موجود، امکان تعیین ملاکی برای وجه تمایز الگو در حوزه طراحی رشته برنامه درسی، بررسی شد. برای دستیابی به این هدف از روش پژوهش تحلیلی- اسنادی بهره گرفته شد. نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که الگوها در حوزه طراحی برنامه درسی، از دو منظر ساختار و موضوع دارای دسته بندی های متفاوتی می‌باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Reflection on the Significance of Model in Curriculum Design

نویسندگان [English]

  • rahim shalian 1
  • Mahmood saeedy Rezvany 2
  • Amir Aminyazdi 2
  • Hossein karshki 2
  • Mohsen asghari Nekah 2

1 ferdowsi university of mashhad

2 ferdowsi university of mashhad

چکیده [English]

One of the activities of experts in the field of curriculum design is their endeavours to understand conceptual structures of this realm of human knowledge, and an instance of such efforts is the article titled "Analysis of the Conceptual Model in Curriculum Filed: Critical Review of Researchers Done With Model Design Approach Curriculum" in which the authors have initially categorized the models into “procedural”, “descriptive” and “conceptual” in the field of curriculum design based on the ideas put forth by Posner’. They have then analyzed researches conducted in the field of curriculum with the model design approach in terms of model description, type of model used and its usage. In this study, it has been attempted to decide to what extend the titles and evaluations presented in the article are in line with the nature of matters of curriculum design. In the end, with the help of available resources, we have addressed the possibility of determining criteria for distinguishing models in the field of curriculum design. The study has revealed that the models in the field of curriculum design have different categorizations in terms of structure and subject matter which will be discussed in the present article.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • model (pattern)
  • Design
  • curriculum
Akker, J. v. d., Fasoglio, D., and Mulder, H. (2010). A curriculum perspective on plurilingual education. SLO (Netherlands institute for curriculum development). The Council of Europe Press.
Beyer, E., Michael, W., and Apple, W. (1998). The Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Birnbaum, R. (2003). How colleges work: the cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. (H. Arasteh, Trans). Tehran: Institute for Research and planning in Higher Education. (In Persian)
Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative sociology, 19(6), 418-427.
Dehghani, M. (2012). Designing optimal (alternative) model for social education curriculum of middle school in Iran. (Doctoral Dissertation, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad). (In Persian)
Dehghani, M., Amin Khandaghi, M., jafari Suny, H., and Noghani Dokht Bahmani, M. (2011). Analysis of the Conceptual Model in Curriculum Filed: Critical review of researchers done with model design approach curriculum. Journal of Foundations of Education, 1(1), 99-126.
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The Educational Imagination On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. New York: Macmillan.
Fathi vajargah, K. (2007). Curriculum Toward New Identities, (Vol. 1, pp. 1-342). Tehran: Aeeyg. (In Persian)
Levin, B. (2010). Curriculum Governance and Planning. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 379-383). Oxford: Elsevier.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., and Gall, J. P. (2008). Educational Research: An Introduction. 6 Th Ed. (A. R. Nasr, H. R. Orizy, M. abolghasemi, K. Bagheri, M. H. Alamatsaz, M. J. Pakseresht, et al., Trans). Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian)
Gardner Howard, A. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. 10 Th Ed. Basic Books Press
Gooler, D. D., and Grotelueschen, A. (1970). Process Accountability in Curriculum Development. Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Goodlad, J. (1994). Curriculum as a field of study. In The international encyclopedia of education, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Maleki, H. (2003). Integrated approach to curriculum. Tehran: PTO. (In Persian)
Marsh, C. J. (2009). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum, 4 th Ed. Taylor and Francis Routledge Press.
McKernan, J. (2008). Curriculum and imagination: process theory, pedagogy and action. USA and Canada: Routledge.
McCutcheon, G. (1982). What in the World is curriculum theory? Theory into practice, 11(1), 18-22.
Mellers, B. A., and Baron, J. (2008). Psychological perspectives on justice: theory and applications. Digitally printed version.
Miller, J. P. (2007). The Educational Spectrum: Orientation to Curriculum. (M. Mehrmohammadi, Trans). Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian)
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2009). Key Consideration the Policy Making for Interdisciplinary Sciences in Higher Education from the Standpoint of Development Process. Journal Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(3), 1-18. (In Persian)
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2013). A Reflection on Curriculum Development with an emphasis on Eisner view: An outdated or an up to date mission. Jornal new educational approaches, 1(17), 1-20. (In Persian)
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2010). Curriculum Theories, Approaches and Perspectives. 2th Ed. Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian)
Mehrmohammadi, M. and Amin Khandaghi, M. (2009). The Comparison of Eisner's With Miller's Curriculum Ideologies: Another View. Journal of Foundations of Education, 10(1), 27-45. (In Persian)
Ornstein, A. C., and Hunkins, F. P. (2009). Curriculum: foundations, principles, and issues. (G. Ahgar, Trans). Islamic Azad University Press. (In Persian)
Portelli, J. P. (1987). On defining curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(4), 354–367.
Short, E. C. (2008). Forms of curriculum inquiry. (M. Mehrmohammadi, Trans). Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian).
Short, E. C. (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. State University or New York Press.
Stangvic, G. (1998). Conflicting perspectives on learning disabilities. In: C. Clark, A. Dyson and A. Millward, Theorising special Education, New York, Routledge Press.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum, Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
Thijs, A., and Akker J. (2009). Curriculum development. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).
Thornton, S. (2010). Curriculum Design. In Encyclopedia of curriculum Studies. Sage.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. The University of Chicago Press.
Walker, D. F. (1982). Curriculum Theory is many things to many people, Theory into practice, 11(1), 62-65.
Walker, D. F. (2003). Fundamentals of curriculum: passion and professionalism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.